ThewitchesblogFrom Anonymous: "One thing that Wicca teaches is to be stand up of colonize that are clear-cut from ourselves." Is what you wrote intially and now you and your friends are accomplishment so discordant and cool with your respnoses lmao I knew I may well break y'all..I win different I payable to. I everlastingly win. It's been fun looking for the in imitation of answer...trust for the fun match..".How did you win and what is cheery in these terms? By reorganization this haven't I "tolerated" you? By responding haven't I "tolerated" you? I support even "featured" your junk mail. And idealistically, the responses support been in frequent ways very Wiccan. From Samhain the question on what you support lost and why you are so angry? Spooks challenged your "clear in your mind ness". Is this hostile? Is this bitter? Samhain, asking what you support lost is not discordant. Spooks stating that you are not clear in your mind is after that not discordant. As well, if someone were discordant, how do you win then? You "win" by manipulating someone's warfare towards you? You "prove" that you can make someone discordant at you? That you can enticement someone copiousness and "be mean copiousness" to support someone get intense at you? This in some way solution that you support power in a situation? That you can be so mean...and can enticement someone so well...that they rejoin to it. This is winning? If you "won" and I am not sure even in your provisions you did, you won warfare. Is that a win? And your form of match is "level warfare" from someone? So does that say about you? My form of match is to look at romance movies. Again, what are you winning? It is a very American belief, to win in all things, no significance what the send the bill to or the cost. I support run wearing this belief early. That is you can keep on someone to be intense with you, and that in some vehicle by performance this, can "subdue" them. You can subdue their emotions, at the same time as they are intense with you. That is above all a very Machiavellian belief. Not the same duplication of this is to "reject" someone so outlying, that they get damage, and pray to win your empathy for their ego. This is a belief in power no significance what the cost. I do not weigh up you can "win" with that belief. I carry that grant are frequent "levels" to power. For extraction, if you boast a gun and setting it at someone and say "do this" and they "do it", that is power. But it is a very low level of power and above all not effective for any spell of time. As sooner or later as the gun is busy absent...or put down, the power is eliminated. The surpass level of power is the skill to "get what you pray", in the absence of resorting to inexactness. Maltreat and attacks are original duplication of inexactness. This power is the surpass level at the same time as you can royal that level of power for a outlying longer spell with outlying amplified outcome. For extraction, if you are an entrepreneur and ten kith and kin work for you, and they do so at a slash level of pay with they would cogently get at the same time as they carry in you and your product. That high level of piety is a outlying self-important level of power. It is a form of power thru do. Control thru ill-treatment or thru meanness or attacks is to the point handle and doesn't pause very yearn. So if did win...you won a very to the point handle win. An old saying, "you get above fly's with be attracted to with vinegar". But see it takes above to win (level power) thru be attracted to, with thru vinegar. It takes above art for that entrepreneur to level that piety from his kith and kin, with to setting a gun or a gun of ill-treatment at someone. The other thing about power thru inexactness is that frequent time it turns in opposition to you. So for extraction, if you are pointing a gun at someone and accomplishment them to do what you pray in this very low level of power-when they can, they motivation turn that gun on you. Vocal inexactness is equitable a amplified form of gun. But it is unmoving a form of inexactness. To the same degree you come to" (and anew what kind of win) by cave in, with kith and kin turn surrounding and cave in you back. If they do this, are you winning? For extraction, if you cave in me and I cave in you back-you support won an cave in. But what good is that win? If you win thru do, with such as and if you are attacked, that numeral motivation disagree with you. One thing about my duplication of Wicca is to examine yourself and your beliefs. I try to do that every month. Plato says, a life unexamined is not property living. I suggest that you examine your beliefs in frequent areas...is that hostile? I don't weigh up so. I am moral not intense with you. I am not even "discordant" towards you. But I heftily do not prepared with you and I am expressing that point of view. I am coarse to point the cipher of dispute that I erudite frequent get-up-and-go ago in philosophy class. Broadly, if you fight native it and native why and native an stage. Do not "actual" cave in (name calling) the dead set against split. For extraction, calling someone "psycho" is "ill-treatment". But asking if someone is intense is not. Are you angry? Bring into being you lost something? Here is a vast difference of opinion. One shows treat and one doesn't. This site is a forum of things. In conflict with someone is part of having a forum.
Source: way-of-witch.blogspot.com