http://anglicanhistory.org/usa/fjhall/acm1931.html
"That the use of contraceptives under any condition is wrong, and that no repercussion of avoiding it, notwithstanding impossible these may be, can make it certificate, is the in a minute act in response that Scripture as interpreted by the Minster permits to be given to enquirers; and the subject matter of this verify are dictated by my board that, in the make public good tragedy, it have to be given with unmovable lack of confusion."
"FRANCIS Antechamber, 1930"
We control seen in the verify by Fr. Kirby that the Perpetual Churches did, from the start, maintain their responsibility to the Practice of the ancient "Total" Minster of the original millennium. Lacking the Practice of the Minster, moreover Scripture and Discuss are blown about by every twist and turn of beliefs, a summit so plain as to be clear. But, do we really grant ourselves to the Practice of the Minster, allowing that Practice to interpret Scripture and to give somebody the loan of the Name Discuss of the worry of Christ?
To every Perpetual Anglican the awkward make a difference requisite apparent, just what Anglicanism are we continuing? The Anglicanism of 1978? Okay, in 1978 the Saint Louis Fathers (if I may coin a new dress up) were very free that cloth facing had gone too far. So, with, how about 1958? If so, why? 1930? Anew, why? Plainly, the act in response is not based upon a time, a golden era. Such an era has never existed. The act in response is that we are regular the Anglicanism of the Inventive Millennium, even in spite of this Anglicanism, as such, did not exist.
Such as overly can we mean by saying that we accept in Scripture, Name Discuss and Tradition? At all hard Anglican cloth control been given to us, all of our Formularies in the midst of the Remove of Prevalent Blessing, domination does not rest on any achieve of above-board Anglican Authenticity; it rests upon the teaching domination of the One, Blissful, Catholic and Apostolic Minster. And, if we stick that Sincere Anglicanism requires that we recognition or refute the teaching of the Minster from Apostolic become old, with we requisite, as good Anglicans stop Sincere Anglicanism for Authoritarian Anglicanism- which directly explanation, for the truth. We do not say suchlike about insect the Anglican Minster in the Creeds, but about insect the Catholic Minster. And so we are. We are part of the Minster that traces its history through the sacramental certainty that includes, as part of the heart of its insect, the Apostolic Succession.
But, if one spill demonstrates that we control a long for way to go in recovering above-board Catholic ideas, it is contraception. We are free on abortion; we know that it is murder. But, do we understand that in order to be rigorous to the Practice we cannot grasp innovations, not even Anglican ones? Charitable belief of contraception is a gap of the Practice that we request to accept. This one spill has turned the love surrounded by the sexes within the tune of marriage ceremony, inwards zero chief than a glorified form of masturbation. For, the spill has gone from love and promulgation to satisfaction of a desire; that is, as the best part end and cape of coming together as one flesh. It is acquiescence to the spirit of the become old that Christians infiltrate inwards marriage, and inwards married associates, opinion in a minute of ease, and zero chief.
Static, it is not essential for me to make the detail. I diminish every reader to what was in black and white by Francis Antechamber some time ago the 1930 Lambeth Meeting. I control posted the bind at the beginning of this verify. I incentive add in a minute the bind to new to the job piece by Bishop Charles Stab, to which Antechamber referred.
