I put David here nearest, such as I dislike his part, and it would be mend if it never got in the book.
He sounds luxuriously imitation to me.
Peter assumed "In 1970 a recyclable man (25) David Spangler and his spiritual link Myrtle Glines came to Findhorn from America. For numerous years early that, David had been a lecturer and writer on New Age themes. The same as he trendy he found us to be a dozen or so people working in a garden and living a God-centered life. Here the substantial eighteen months community involvement grew to 150. Voguish David's three engagement slouch our commune delayed inwards that of a New Age community and training self."
He was 19 afterward he was asked to speak about his "guides" to a fat ordinary, and a engagement far ahead he vanished his studies and became a professional New Ager... "lecturer, professor, back away"...
He went to Findhorn such as he found "words to be not acceptable to bring about the New World" and Findhorn was what he had been looking for... Nevertheless, sharp as he trendy to the garden, he starts to be decided it. He has had this "spirit guide", "John", who abruptly becomes some sort of diplomat "in favor of the interests and the consciousness of the elemental kingdoms", so placing "John" as finer direct than Pan, Scene Angel, even God. They haven't pleasing any emissaries so far, they didn't desire one 1970 either, but David pleasing the power and direct.
Now, in Findhorn, people are used to simple, middle and pure institution of Peter, Eileen, Dorothy and Roc, who actually do difficulty what the other life forms are saying, and David is not foolish, so he creates the "messages" so that they zealous twin inhabitants coming from God and Devas.
That the garden is boringly losing the liveliness doesn't experimental one, they identifiable David to predict them it's as it call for be.
"Are you saying hand over prerequisite be changes mede in the way the gardening is being done here at Findhorn?"
"That is what I am saying", answers "John".
Yeah, unswerving...
He doesn't see the birds spirits and devas as social group, no, he sees Man as better, God-like and with a board to take over the world. I dislike it afterward he repeats advanced and advanced another time "Man has independence advanced birds".
"John" sayd "the birds kingdoms stare to you to lead them". "
"John" says "Man first and foremost desires abandoned to distribute to the beings of birds what is skirt flaw any other physical gesture on his part...
The humans are here to lead, advise, teach, hearsay and correction, train these "dumb beasts" inwards being mend themselves as they sooner than are.
Beside it all he shows a sad misreading of the birds of devas and birds spirits.
"Portray are beings that regard consideration as a inconvenience at best, a imperfect, unmanageable muscle at extreme..."
I get the engraving that the birds spirits see us as some sort of lost, muddled, incomprehensible children, not responsive of our own power or meaning, screen, deaf, dumb, but oh, so prideful, playing our indefinable games and causing deteriorate, twin a child ripping off wings from a fly such as it doesn't understand the fly is a knowledgeable being, a dot of life, as sharp as we are.
Nah. I say he's imitation. Now, I haven't met him, nor spoken with him, I identifiable no other incident of him, but afterward Peter's, Eileen's, Dorothy's and Roc's story fills me with love, recollection and bank on, David fills me with dislike, misgivings, and takes me down.
