The Answer Of A Member Of The Tibetan Parliament We Dont Know Anything About Nechung

or watch on our server:http://video.dorjeshugden.com/videos/TPiEevadingquestions.flvBY: TENZIN CHOJE A cleric of the lower house holds immense odd jobs. The words that they speak and the way that they behave portray the believe of the organization that they are part of. Except, this is not so for the parliamentarians of the Of great magnitude Tibetan Method (CTA). At any time the bear down on of France 24, an multi-ethnic French information starting point interviewed members of the Tibetan lower house about their put up with on Nechung's predictions which must give birth to been an unravel to collect confirmation for the Tibetan donate and to fashion greater understanding and authority of the Tibetan culture, live in interviewed were not easily reserved about the ask, but both unseemly and improper of leaders correct to lead the Tibetans out of decades of pessimism. One of them even taunted the journalist who asked the ask, deflecting the ask entirely! The bear down on elegance a enthusiast of the Tibetan lower house, who is a rector, and asks him about Nechung, hard to get a alight picture of how the lower house accepts Nechung's directives. "Do you take up in the predictions of the oracle?" Get pleasure from a deer baffled in headlights, he looks at the camera,video is that it shows his eyes deep in bump, talker begin, so repeating "This one, I don't know." His point of view words to the revelry was, "You ask atypical" before deficiency an escape. The bordering two parliamentarians that were interviewed were not worthy either. One waved every one hands in front line of him saying "We don't know whatever about Nechung". This itself is debauched as Nechung has hope been regarded as a key neighborhood author and an elemental enthusiast of the Tibetan House of representatives by the Dalai Lama's own definition. His link in black eyeglasses, who was listening with folded arms, attempts to be snooty worthy by pointing the camera revelry to a Geshe (studious scholar), "Geshe La confer on be cunning to help you. You must ask him." At this reflection, the spokesperson points out that questions are unwelcomed, and that the spiritual grasp is not questioned. "Ah, yes yes yes, I'm monk!" the Geshe stated, so sated stylish joyfulness with other members of the lower house joining him in a domineering badger, as if it was bizarre, cultural fraud that the bear down on did not get. He was, in actuality, acerbic the journalist and ridiculing and discouraging them from asking press forward. The spokesperson proclaims, "Towards the end, a parliamentary mine answers our ask", dramatic that they give birth to been more exactly useless in discrimination one that would passion them really. One of them who of late does, Penpa Tsering explains the picture in imitation of shielding deities, where they are relied upon to score things where humans are not cunning to under social class. Not the same bespectacled lower house enthusiast bells in. "We cannot referee, so then we confer on ask him, in which way we must go, so he confer on grant us the guiding principle, the true guiding principle. The world power way." The journalist interjects. "The world power way?" in which he responds in a schoolboy-ish process, "Yeah, yeah. The world power way. We're very very important what he says about it ". The journalist asks for an acknowledgment once more, "Are you very sure?" and a very informal "Sure, important, important," was uttered, before the enthusiast of the lower house station stylish his develop, as even as the seminar was distracting his supper and he was starved.Legislature OF THE TIBETANS? The members of the lower house are thought to be the ceiling studious of the land, the slime of the goods, designated in by live in who take up in their abilities as they portray the correlation that designated them in. Except, as we can statement from this video, the tone, the mannerisms and construction discourse that these members of the lower house signify to the TV bear down on are far from what is restrained virtuous. At any time the ask on Nechung was posed to them, more exactly of replying the ask in a imposing, professional mistrust breed their counterparts would in other countries, these members of lower house shrugged the ask off simply and avoided it all together, weakness even transport a accurate reply. The fact is that they portray the Tibetan employees whenever you like they discussion on this seminar that is aired on French State TV. The bear down on are requesting for an authorized discharge on Nechung. How is it accurate for a parliamentary enthusiast who represents the employees to shrug off questions pertaining to authorized matters in this way? In any of the G7 countries (U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan), such a enthusiast of the lower house would be questioned, criticized and assumed reliable for his good manners by the employees, but why is such unprofessional good manners bureaucrat in the Tibetan cabinet? Is this the way the members of the lower house, the building of the employees must be behaving? No, but the negotiate why they are undisturbed members of the lower house is because CTA is not a deeply open-minded organization. These ministers give birth to perfect power, which is why they can make statements and act in ways that they do not conduct to be answerable for. The negotiate for this is that ceiling of the Tibetans are not even observant that such good manners is shown. It is not so widely of what they rumored, it is the way that they rumored it: the Tibetan members of lower house signify a very informal, uncaring, curt and pushy aloofness towards the good of the Tibetans as well as the matters of the engage in. The ask that requirements to be asked is whether such good manners deliberate the strap thinness of leaders conjoin for the Tibetans to negotiate the association issues with China doll, not to mention sack the Tibetan correlation stylish a competitive modern world must they profit the autonomy they expedition. Having exhausted decades corporation with world leaders and governments, it is a ruination that the Tibetans and His Spirituality are represented so insubordinately One can see how in the meeting place of the video, the rector attempts to danger the bear down on by talent himself a rector and smiling at that discharge together with the rest of the parliamentarians draft. One may ask, is this how a rector must behave? The same in usual correlation, live in who were bound are for example off line of attack, and at all become old signify chastise in their goings-on and proclamation. In accumulation to that, laypersons are correct to signify line of attack and chastise towards monks. Not this one, as the rector jokes about his robes and monkhood as if it was a very bizarre insider fraud that easily members of the lower house would understand. This shows how disrespectful they are towards a rector at any rate allegedly for example Buddhists, and they are the ones that are governing a Buddhist organization. They do not sympathy at all of the employees that they are thought to portray and they do not conduct to be assumed answerable for their goings-on. The statements and attitudes that they signify are not too alternative from live in from 3rd world countries, where the control party can say whatever they destitution, and they confer on not be assumed answerable for whatever hurt that the discharge has incurred and personality who disagrees or questions their statements confer on be rubbed off by the control organization. In fact, the CTA has prior to done no matter which of a constant nature by firing the Improved of Data lines Passable Asia, Nagpo Jigme for expressing views that oppose the CTA. So, if CTA was deeply a open-minded circumstances, must it not be that they allow others with a opposite intention to detail their opinions too? That is what a open-minded circumstances would do, and that is the usual practice of any circumstances that declares them as open-minded. The good manners of the CTA is intelligibly that of an unconstitutional control, where not any is bureaucrat to ask the organization. Not the same evident sign of the CTA's unconstitutional control is the outmoded Dorje Shugden ban that was implemented by the Dalai Lama, where personality that disagrees with the ban confer on be nowadays made a exile of the Tibetan correlation. Particular of the wounded of this ban are Kundeling Rinpoche and Gangchen Rinpoche and these Lamas has been silenced and unfashionable from Dharamsala, emphatically for their belief in Dorje Shugden.NECHUNG WHO? The count in ask is Nechung. Nechung is a divine for example. Jerk by vouch by Padamasambhava, the 8th century Buddhist saint to protect the Dalai Lama, Nechung can be consulted by every one the Dalai Lama and the organization to discuss on matters that cannot be determined with apparent basic. As Nechung is a deity, a god, he cannot be contacted by means of usual basic, and a way of contacting him is by him sack trance of an mystic, which has been authority for this intention. The Dalai Lama himself has authentic expect on Nechung, as he consults this mystic for any decisions that he is unable to make, widely breed how we would discuss a medium for answers. The Dalai Lama even call Nechung to guide him on request, in his furtive household. Such is the level of have faith in that the Dalai Lama has for Nechung. The important video shows the Dalai Lama consulting Nechung for matters of engage in, at any rate the fact that he is an unenlightened deity (see underside): [Organize is a video that cannot be displayed in this seek. Lodge the blog invasion to see the video.] or watch on our server:http://video.dorjeshugden.com/videos/HHDLReliesOnNechung.flv Except, from the video, one can see from the resolution of the members of lower house that they are not certified at all with what they are saying whenever you like they discussion about gullible Nechung and his predictions. These members of lower house even say that they do not know what Nechung is, whenever you like in fact, they expedition put off and directives from him at nominal on one occasion a rendezvous, in the apparition of the Dalai Lama. This makes the lower house members' grasp that they do not know what Nechung is a pushy lie. TO SAY THAT YOU DO NOT Greet NECHUNG IS TO SAY THAT YOU ARE In the dark OF At the same time as DRIVES TIBETAN POLICIES AND As well as THAT, THIS House of representatives HAS Painfully Substandard THEIR Appointment AS THE Representing OF THE Dwell in. IT IS THEIR JOB TO Greet At the same time as AFFECTS AND INFLUENCES Shape POLICIES. They either grove it off overanxiously or try to danger the questioner, in this contention, the journalist, a very unseemly and in trade way of answering a ask. The negotiate why is because not any is bureaucrat to ask the grasp of the Dalai Lama and to say that they do not take up in Nechung would mean that they are leaving versus the Dalai Lama's spiritual grasp and decisions, so many of them evade that ask to put-on on the usefulness pile. But what they say do not make tally their construction discourse, as it intelligibly shows in the video that they are not certified at all with what they josh of, and are easily feint it out of misgiving. In other words, the Dalai Lama's directives on parliamentary matters condition be followed, and ceiling of these decisions would give birth to come from Nechung. So, how can it be that the CTA claims to be open-minded but is expansively ruled by an barely visible for example, a god that cannot be assumed answerable for his actions? Jamyang Norbu, a fruitful family Tibetan author, has decorated very intelligibly about this problem where here were many inaccuracies with Nechung's idea and one of them actually sent snooty than 700 Tibetan crowd to their deaths as Nechung sent them off to war with knives and swords versus the British pistols and rifles, flushed a divine navy which never came. He press forward points out that here is a unintended that consultations with Nechung can be abused or misused so that not any has to passion commit if the neighborhood that they make turns out to be deceiving. In a way, Nechung becomes a scapegoat if no matter which goes deceiving and the CTA can easily say "But we followed Nechung's guidance!" and they confer on not conduct to be assumed answerable for their deceiving decisions (see Jamyang Norbu's video underside): [Organize is a video that cannot be displayed in this seek. Lodge the blog invasion to see the video.] or watch on our server:http://video.dorjeshugden.com/videos/JamyangNorbu.flv Not the same exciting thing to detect in the video is that it shows very intelligibly that the Tibetans do not really have faith in the directives of Nechung but they turn up to take up Nechung whenever you like he talked about how bad Dorje Shugden is, and they presume the ban joyfully, effective with impunity live in who practice Dorje Shudgen. Nechung is the fortunate of the neighborhood that has of your own accord make public the Tibetan Buddhist community. Why is here such a pushy volatility on common view on Nechung's advice? Once again, this shows the imprudent, selective and curt locate that the lower house members give birth to on Nechung, which the Dalai Lama himself relies on, show their lack of encouragement on the Dalai Lama, their spiritual controller, expansively. The Dalai Lama has apparently relied on Nechung's prophecies for so many existence. Could it be that the Tibetans' expect on Nechung is of late degeneration in the light of so many inaccuracies? So it is tidy on why are the members of lower house are lackadaisical to discussion about Nechung, because it shows how backwards and outmoded they are and how widely they destitution to return to old, feudal Tibet, at any rate the many baseless predictions that Nechung has made, even as just this minute as point of view year's indicator about natural mishap in India which never happened. On the other hand, they try intensely to coat the fact that they are consulting Nechung, because it would oppose state glaring, and it confer on not honor good in front line of other snooty grown countries, such as the G7 group of grown nations. They are simply saying one thing and feint atypical.THE Sway OF THE CTA On one occasion this video, one can safely shut down that here are shoddy flaws within CTA's lower house. If what we give birth to seen in the opposite direction in this clip is thought to be the ceiling cultured Tibetans of Dharamsala, used for the populace of Tibetans, how can we belief the CTA to passion sympathy of the employees in Dharamsala and snooty so, verify Tibet? If they behave in such a disrespectful way towards lobby whom they are thought to put on their best good manners to, presumption how do they consideration their own people? The pushy maltreatment that is for example displayed by the members of lower house to the lobby would be fair the tip of the iceberg, and it would be awful that the oppression that they confer on trudge on live in who are under them many become old snooty. As well as such a lower house, coupled with the incapacity to move on from an outmoded, religious ban turned possible, it is no bliss CTA is unable to score self chauvinism for the point of view 50 existence or so.